CASE 31: Revision due to severe adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) using a proximal femoral replacement

The Story

“The patient is a 76 year old female with a painful, dislocating, shortened and infected right proximal femoral replacement, having undergone 25 right hip operations.

Eight years previously in 2008 she had a right total metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. She developed ARMD which required multiple operations for debridement. She then developed an infected hip. One of her inpatient stays was for 365 days, during which she had 15 operations.

One operations was for a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap to cover her soft tissue defect.”

 

The Investigation

Examination revealed that she was chair-bound and unable to walk. She transferred with the aid of a leg calliper due to her sciatic nerve palsy. Blood tests revealed an ESR of 26mm/H and a CRP of 19mg/L.

Pre-operative radiographs explored the current situation.

 

The Evidence

Anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of the patient’s pelvis.  The top image shows a located proximal femoral replacement in a custom trial-flange-flange acetabulum.

The bottom image shows that this has dislocated due to instability, causing the patient pain.

Above is a pre-operative long leg film. Note that there is a 4.5cm  block under the right foot.

 

The Diagnosis

This patient was diagnosed with a painful, dislocating, shortened and infected right proximal femoral replacement. The plan was for a two stage revision for her right hip.

 

The Operation - First Stage

The patient underwent first stage revision surgery in July 2016. An articulating spacer was not used because of the soft tissue destruction. Imaging after the first stage provided good quality CT images to plan and make a custom made acetabular implant. This implant was chosen to maximise the fixation so that a constrained liner with dual mobility articulation was possible whilst minimising the risk of implant loosening.

Samples from the first stage surgery grew Pseudomonas and Proteus. The patient received a 6 week course of Cefazidimine and her CRP at the end of this was 11mg/L. The sinus however was still discharging.

The patient was discussed at the Bone Infection MDT at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital and the decision was made to repeat the first stage of the revision.

 

First Outcome

Anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis from September 2016. The metal work has been removed on the right side.

Post-Op CT used to design and plan the acetabular component of this revision surgery. It was also used in the planning of the proximal femoral replacement.

This 3D model of the patient’s right hemipelvis has been recreated from the post-operative first stage computer tomography scan demonstrating a Paprosky 3B pelvic defect.

 
 

The Operation - Second Stage

This shows a 3D representation of the custom acetabular component. It is made using trabecular titanium which encourages bony ingrowth into the implant.

The METS proximal femoral replacement system is a modular proximal femoral replacement with a cemented stem and HA collar to achieve initial stability and encourage bony ingrowth.

The patient underwent second stage revision surgery with a custom made, 3D printed titanium acetabular and proximal femoral replacement. She was delighted at being able to transfer from bed to chair and take some steps.

 

Second Outcome

Post Operative radiographs from 6 months after the operation showing the METS proximal femoral replacement articulating with the custom Trabecular Titanium acetabular implant. Both components are well fixed and well positioned.

This is a computer generated 3D reconstruction of the proximal femoral replacement and custom acetabular implant in situ, produced from the post-operative computer tomography scan.

Post operative CT - This post-operative computer tomography scan shows the acetabular component with good contact to the host bone and a well-positioned proximal femoral replacement.

This is a full body post operative EOS scan which demonstrates the standing functional position of the implant.

 

The Verdict

“ARMD and infection is one of the hardest hip problems to resolve.

Custom made acetabular implants increase the chance of implant fixation when there is high stress due to a constrained liner and several soft tissue destruction.

This patient was delighted at being able to transfer from bed to chair comfortably: the first time in 5 years. She was able to walk with two crutches across the clinic room.

She had no pressure sores, but infection was still ongoing at this point.”

  • Please see Case 30

Previous
Previous

CASE 30: Revision due to severe adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) using a custom 3D printed cup

Next
Next

CASE 32: Revision for infection using a non-modular long femoral stem